INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS What comes back to painting. I see that this sharply defined as decorative and illusionist. Is created to be unique in its production. In order that everything goes to excite and designed to be hung on walls. Like any artist, his eagerness is transgressive and transgressive art is figurative because it violates the code bound by tradition. Transgression, is formal. It is precisely because it offends formal transgression. Directly offends the viewer / spectator because it insecurity perceptual habits. Directly gives a vision. The observer quickly appreciated kinesthetic sensations. Now, that is infringing, call box to something that has not been painted directly. The only rule is do not leave anything for later, everything is completely done by hand "electronically, there is a standard to maintain distance to the work. Aided by computers Bibi, draw lines on top of a plastic tablet (digitizer) without or SON TOM. Without looking messy contour lines, as obsessive and automaton. Without defining anything. Then one day we all discovered that their figures or abstract have something in common that makes it appear, or to call into question our visual sense. Although I have no doubt to be true in a building as a nexus of the creative process is a self-imposed rule. Virtually created attends one day the artist to his birth. A single work is printed in their eyes and see the artist happily get the work completed without electronic devices to be seen. Once was exo-image, now is substance applied on a support. A product created to be seen. The innovative goal of every artist label. And can be shown. And we can follow our retina. The short initial impression is a disorder in the physical limits. It away we move from one stage to a state abstract figurative. Herein lies the artistic struggle. The engine that makes produce. Finding something to transmit. In my experience as an artist in the show I've been doing in recent years I've noticed the following: There are two groups of people when they look at my work. Viewers and observers. The first denying their eyes would not accept. It's a sham, a visual trick that made me fall from grace. Now, that is infringing, call box to something that has not been painted directly offensive, and to the extent that they feel cheated is offended. His criticism is for me a good testimony. This art work is no answer. I answer what you see is what it is. The observer still think it does not matter as it is done. The important thing is that you can see, in fact or ask. Feel only the pleasure of seeing. It's something new. Not every day we surprised to see something new, like I did when creating it, is an aura of mystery of artistic brotherhood. Always have tried to establish the boundaries between what is art and what is not, the art moves more quickly than attitudes. The only thing that sets out what is what ... no, it is the time. Can only say that what we see is not simple, can not be summarized in two words, but that it takes billions of lines to describe. What I think makes it work, I pack morphological elements is simple and old (The line is used by man for more than 77,000 years) against sophisticated mathematical algorithms, but after all this time we do the same, seeing and feeling through the lines.